MTAC Meeting Presentations 2014

Product Development – First-Class Mail

Product Development – Standard Mail

Product Development – Packages

Product Development – Periodicals

Visibility & Service Performance – First-Class Mail

Visibility & Service Performance – Standard Mail

Visibility & Service Performance – Packages

Visibility & Service Performance – Periodicals

Mail Prep and and Entry – All Classes

Payment and Acceptance – All Classes

https://ribbs.usps.gov/mtac/documents/tech_guides/2014/presentations/may2014/

 

 

January 2014 MTAC Open Session Presentations

January 2014–Operations Update–Megan Brennan
January 2014–Financial Update–Joe Corbett Chief Financial Officer & EVP
January 2014–National Postal Forum: Stronger Together–Sharon Owens
January 2014–Product Development Focus Group Year End Review–Gary Reblin VP New Products and Innovation
January 2014–Mail Preparation & Entry Focus Group Year End Review–Cathy Moon Mgr Integration and Support (Operations)
January 2014–Payment & Acceptance Focus Group Year End Review–Pritha Mehra VP Mail Entry and Payment Technology
January 2014–Visibility/Service Measurement Focus Group Year End Review–Robert Cintron VP Product Information

Via RIBBS

MTAC 135 Makes Progress on D&R Tags

There was a meeting of the MTAC 135 Workgroup today to discuss the feedback from USPS Engineering on the D&R (Dispatch & Routing) tags. (rewind a few weeks –> mailers had requested some additional white space be allocated on the D&R tags to allow them some room for “mailer information” – Engineering’s first response was “no – we don’t see a business reason for it” – the industry said “it’s not YOUR business need – it’s OURS” -> fast forward to now)  Engineering now says they can accommodate either a longer or wider tag, but the industry has to make a decision on which because it can’t support both.  When that decision is made by the industry, Engineering will work on and publish specs detailing where the mailer info white-space is.  (btw, rumor has it than an internal USPS mock-up document showed the mailer info at the bottom of the tag)

The USPS will first contact the tag and print vendors to see what they can support (longer or wider or either) – then they will survey the mailers.  More info to follow as it becomes available.

A meeting attendee asked if the USPS will change THEIR stock to accommodate the new sized tags (when in use) to fully cover the mailer’s tag if there is the need for an “overlay”.

The USPS responded that they will need to look into how to accomodate this – just as the industry will – and they will let us know.

 

Wallace Vingelis

Director, Postal Industry Practice

Window Book, Inc.                

Phone:  (617) 395-4569

email:    wvingelis@windowbook.com

USPS Holds Innovation Symposium at MTAC

At last week’s MTAC meetings, things were a little different than normal.  Instead of a lot of committee and workgroup updates on the first day (Wednesday), the USPS requested that the MTAC membership and attendees break out into separate workgroups to focus on USPS innovation for the future.  There were 10 separate groups all tasked with the same thing:  bringing innovative ideas to the attention of the USPS for consideration and implementation.  All 10 groups ranked their top 3 ideas and presented them to the rest of the MTAC attendees.  These 30ish (not every group had 3) ideas were captured and sent around for everyone to vote on with the goal being a Top 3 list for the USPS to act and report on. 

Unfortunately, the Top 3 list was not available before we broke the meetings on Thursday, but as soon as it’s available, I’ll post it here.  In the meantime, check out the list of top ideas we voted on:

Symposium Results – Page 1

Symposium Results – Page 2

Symposium Results – Page 3

 

Wallace Vingelis

Director, Postal Industry Practice

Window Book, Inc.                

Phone:  (617) 395-4569

email:    wvingelis@windowbook.com

Mail Verification Changes for Intelligent Mail

The United States Postal Service® (USPS®) announced some modifications to the current mail verification processes during the recent Mailers Technical Advisory Committee (MTAC) meetings and in webinars presented to mailers last week. These changes to the verification processes became effective with the implementation of the Intelligent Mail® (IM) discounts on November 29, 2009.

 

For the most part, the USPS will conduct mail verifications using the same procedures as in the past. For IM Full Service mailings, the USPS has introduced hand-held scanning units, called FS-IMD’s, that will be used by acceptance clerks to collect data samples from mailpieces and tags on containers and mail handling units (sack tags, tray tags, pallet placards, etc.). These scanners have been deployed only to acceptance units with high volumes of mail, so not all acceptance units will be subject to these verification changes. It has not been made clear what, if any, mail verification changes will take place at acceptance units not provided with these scanning units.

 

The additional scanning steps that have been added to the verification process at these acceptance units equipped with the scanners are as follows:

 

Clerk identifies Full Service mailing on the PostalOne! system mailing dashboard.

Clerk uses the FS-IMD device to collect the following samples:

 

  • scans 3 container placards,
  • selects 1 of the scanned containers and scans 5 handling units,
  • selects 3 out of the 5 handling units and scans 30 pieces – 10 piece from each of the handling units

 

Along with the discounts that became effective on November 29, 22009, mailings with the following errors will be subject to loss of the IM Full Service discounts:

 

  • No electronic documentation submitted to the PostalOne! system
  • IMcb (Intelligent Mail Container Barcodes) container placards not placed outside of the container stretch-wrap
  • No IMb (Intelligent Mail Barcode) on mail pieces (>3 pcs) The initial verification sample size is 30 pieces. If the clerk identifies more than 3 of the 30 pieces do not have the required IMb on the mail pieces the mailing will be disqualified for Full Service discounts (this is more than 10% error)
  • No IMcb on container placards (>3) The initial sample requirement is 3 placards. If one placard is found to not have an IMcb on it then an additional 3 placards will be inspected. If more than 3 placards are missing the IMcb the mailing will be disqualified for Full Service discounts (this is more than 50% error)
  • No IMtb (Intelligent Mail Tray Barcode) on handling unit label (>3) The initial sample requirement is 5 tray/sack labels. If one label is found to not have an IMtb on it then an additional 3 labels will be inspected. If more than 3 labels are missing the IMtb, the mailing will be disqualified for Full Service discounts (this is more than 37% error)

 

In cases where the error rate exceeds tolerances and the IM Full Service discounts are forfeited, the USPS will process postage statements for such mailings in the following manner:

 

  • Acceptance personnel will process the electronic postage statement as submitted (discount applied)
  • Acceptance personnel will then conduct a manual adjustment transaction for the loss of Full Service discount.

 

Other Full Service benefits, such as mail tracking or ACS corrections, may be impacted when mailings fail the IM verification, based upon the type of barcode failure. What is not so clear is what exactly those impacts are. I guess we will have to wait and see!

 

Other IM preparation errors, such as non-unique serial numbers in the IM barcodes, or lack of container information in FAST appointments for drop shipments, will not be subject to forfeiture of IM discounts until March 2010. The USPS will, however, be sharing feedback to the mailing industry on the quality of IM mailings so that necessary adjustments may be made prior to March 2010.

 

According to the USPS, internal training webinars have been conducted so that the appropriate acceptance staff will be well versed in the new procedures. Based on past experience, however, there will likely be some acceptance issues that mailers will experience. There are many elements of IM that are confusing to say the least, and the acceptance and assessment processes will be no different. One of the primary concerns of mailers is the accuracy of the existing MERLIN® (Mail Evaluation Readability Lookup Instrument) testing equipment. The USPS has admitted that the software for the MERLIN equipment has not been updated to reflect the IM changes. As many flat-size mailers can attest, MERLIN testing for flat size mailpieces is prone to many errors, even prior to IM implementation.

 

For more details regarding these revised mail verification procedures, you should contact your local business mail entry unit, or refer to the USPS issued mail verification changes document on the USPS RIBBS site.